OSs that suck and why



Todays topic
Windows.*
Mac OS's
and OS/2 if there is time

Dos well lets just say, 16bit code is an 80's thing, sorry to anyone how still thinks the is a real OS

Windows 3.* Not much of an inporment over DOS, Lets just call it a PRETTY DOS

Windows NT 3.5? Well its old if you really want MS as you server, it makes no sense why you would, but if you do get 4.0 it is much better.

Windows 95 Other then the basic desktop the most common screen in 95 is blue with a memory address writen on it.

Windows 98 Windows 95 with the chance of elemating 1% of all GPFs at the expense of your pocket book. The only way anyone should get this upgrade is what a new computer just before they reformat the drive, My experince with win98 is conflicting hardware

Windows NT 4.0 Then next best thing since choped liver, wait liver is better, In my expericne with NT it is win 95 with less application base and one less error, The only thing MS did right on it is to let you actualy configure more it the OS. You get like 5 more choices on how you compter runs for an extra 100 dallors.

MAC OS's The added benifit of Mac OS is it only works ok with mac hardware, but why would you install it anywhere else. The one main Mac problem besides that FUCKING smiling homo, is Cooporative MulityTasking, sure windows had it but witht the relese of win 95 they atleast tryed out Premtive Mulity Tasking. I dont think there is a release of Mac OS with Premetive, But if there is feel free not to tell me about it

OS/2 Well I know next to noghing about it, but I herd, that for anyone who are willing to give you there GFPs you can get a windows like look with no errors. Go find out and forget to tell me about it


home